Close Menu
Florida Golf Cart Accident Attorney / Blog / Golf Cart Accidents / Liability in Golf Cart Accidents: Lessons from a Recent Miami-Dade Case

Liability in Golf Cart Accidents: Lessons from a Recent Miami-Dade Case

Liab3

A recent case in Miami-Dade County, where a court awarded over $50 million in damages after a 12-year-old was severely injured in a golf cart accident, underscores the critical importance of understanding liability in such incidents. The case involved a 16-year-old driver who was authorized by her step-uncle, the golf cart’s owner, to drive the vehicle, leading to a catastrophic accident.

The Role of the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine

At the heart of this case is Florida’s “dangerous instrumentality doctrine,” which holds the owner of a motor vehicle vicariously liable for any damages caused by the vehicle’s negligent operation by another authorized user. The doctrine applies to golf carts, making owners responsible for accidents even if they were not directly involved in the incident. This case is a stark reminder that golf carts, often seen as recreational vehicles, are treated under Florida law with the same gravity as other motor vehicles when it comes to liability.

In the Miami-Dade case, the court found the golf cart’s owner, Chiong, liable because he entrusted the vehicle to his step-niece, who negligently operated it. This resulted in severe injuries, particularly to a 12-year-old passenger named Bennar. The court awarded Bennar over $46 million for his injuries and another $4 million to his parents for loss of consortium.

Importance of Insurance Coverage

The case also highlights the complexities of insurance coverage in golf cart accidents. Although Acuna, the driver, was covered under her parents’ GEICO insurance policy, the insurer initially denied coverage, arguing that the golf cart did not qualify as a “private passenger auto.” However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit later ruled that the policy did cover the golf cart, leading to further litigation.

This aspect of the case is a warning for golf cart owners and operators to thoroughly review their insurance policies. Many auto insurance policies do not automatically cover golf carts, particularly when they are not used on public roads. Therefore, it’s crucial for owners to ensure that their homeowners’ or general liability insurance policies provide adequate coverage for golf cart use. Without sufficient insurance, owners can face enormous financial liabilities, as evidenced by the substantial judgment in this case.

Legal Theories of Liability

The Miami-Dade case also illustrates two key theories of liability under Florida law: negligent entrustment and vicarious liability under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine.

  1. Negligent Entrustment: This theory applies when the owner of a vehicle knowingly allows an unfit or inexperienced person to operate it. In this case, Chiong’s decision to allow his 16-year-old step-niece to drive the golf cart, which resulted in the accident, was deemed negligent. The court held that Chiong breached his duty of care by entrusting the golf cart to an individual who was not capable of operating it safely.
  2. Vicarious Liability: Under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, the owner of a vehicle is liable for damages caused by anyone they permit to drive it, regardless of the owner’s direct involvement in the incident. This doctrine imposes strict liability on the owner, meaning that even if Chiong had not been negligent in allowing his step-niece to drive, he would still be held responsible for the resulting damages because he owned the golf cart.

The Implications of Golf Cart Ownership

For golf cart owners, this case emphasizes the serious legal and financial risks associated with allowing others to operate their vehicles. Florida’s laws impose significant responsibilities on vehicle owners, and golf carts are no exception. Owners must be aware that they can be held liable for any accidents caused by those they allow to drive their carts, even if those drivers are family members or close friends.

To mitigate these risks, golf cart owners should consider the following steps:

  • Review Insurance Policies: Ensure that your insurance policy covers golf cart use, especially if the cart is used outside of private property or in a community setting.
  • Limit Users: Be cautious about who you allow to operate your golf cart. Avoid lending it to minors, inexperienced drivers, or individuals who may not fully understand the responsibilities of operating a motor vehicle.
  • Understand the Law: Familiarize yourself with Florida’s dangerous instrumentality doctrine and other relevant laws that could affect your liability as a golf cart owner.

Contact Frank D. Butler, PA – www.GolfCartAttorney.com

The Miami-Dade case serves as a critical reminder of the serious legal implications of golf cart ownership in Florida. The application of the dangerous instrumentality doctrine in this case highlights the potential for substantial financial liability when accidents occur. For golf cart owners, ensuring proper insurance coverage and exercising caution in who operates their vehicle are essential steps to protect themselves from significant legal and financial risks.

If you have questions about liability related to golf cart ownership or have been involved in a golf cart accident, contact Frank D. Butler, PA. Our firm specializes in golf cart personal injury and product liability cases, and we can provide the legal guidance you need. Reach out to us today for a consultation.

Source:

floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/florida-golf-cart-owners-should-beware-of-huge-potential-liability/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn